<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>How To Survive The Claire Perry Internet &#187; BBC</title>
	<atom:link href="/tag/bbc/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://survivetheclaireperryinter.net</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2015 09:30:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.8</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Lord asks &#8220;Shouldn&#8217;t Filters (that don&#8217;t work) be compulsory?&#8221;</title>
		<link>https://survivetheclaireperryinter.net/2014/01/17/lord-asks-shouldnt-filters-that-dont-work-be-compulsory/</link>
		<comments>https://survivetheclaireperryinter.net/2014/01/17/lord-asks-shouldnt-filters-that-dont-work-be-compulsory/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jan 2014 13:52:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Op]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Censorship Reporting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BBC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Block]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Censorship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Evasion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Filter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Overblocking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[webproxy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://survivetheclaireperryinter.net/?p=195</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On the same day that the BBC reports that &#8220;Children can turn off Net Filters&#8221; a LibDem Lord has asked whether the choice of filtering should be taken out of parents (read everyone&#8217;s) hands and be made compulsory I also welcome the recognition by the Prime Minister and the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport of the<br /><a class="moretag" href="/2014/01/17/lord-asks-shouldnt-filters-that-dont-work-be-compulsory/">Continue reading...</a>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On the same day that the BBC reports that &#8220;<a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-25759345">Children can turn off Net Filters</a>&#8221; a LibDem Lord has asked whether the choice of filtering should be taken out of parents <em>(read everyone&#8217;s)</em> hands <a href="http://www.theyworkforyou.com/lords/?id=2014-01-16a.393.2#g398.0">and be made compulsory</a></p>
<blockquote><p>I also welcome the recognition by the <a title="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prime_Minister_of_the_United_Ki ngdom" href="http://www.theyworkforyou.com/glossary/?gl=264">Prime Minister</a> and the <a title="Secretary of State was originally the title given to the two officials who..." href="http://www.theyworkforyou.com/glossary/?gl=23">Secretary of State</a> for Culture, Media and Sport of the need for adequate filtering to protect young people from online abuse. However, as was discussed in this House only recently with the Online Safety Bill of the noble Baroness, Lady Howe, should we not be making filtering compulsory? Is it enough simply to leave it up to parents to make the choice about appropriate safety features?<small>Lord Clement-Jones</small></p>
</blockquote>
<p>Within weeks of the filters that everyone predicted would herald a slippery slope to mandatory filtering with ever encroaching levels of censorship going online we&#8217;ve already started to slide.</p>
<p>Now more than ever you need to start teaching your friends and family <a href="/">how to survive the Claire Perry Internet</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://survivetheclaireperryinter.net/2014/01/17/lord-asks-shouldnt-filters-that-dont-work-be-compulsory/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Publicity Leads to an unblock for TorrentFreak</title>
		<link>https://survivetheclaireperryinter.net/2014/01/07/publicity-leads-to-an-unblock-for-torrentfreak/</link>
		<comments>https://survivetheclaireperryinter.net/2014/01/07/publicity-leads-to-an-unblock-for-torrentfreak/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jan 2014 20:37:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Op]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Unblock / UTurn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BBC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Block]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Filter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Overblocking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sky]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TorrentFreak]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://survivetheclaireperryinter.net/?p=33</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[days after TorrentFreak posted about Web filtering in the UK Sky has caved and admitted to yet another over blocking mistake and has recategorized torrentfreak.com so it is now reachable. In the opening of their article the BBC clearly state that overblocking is affecting lots of other legitimate websites; Whilst this is a victory for<br /><a class="moretag" href="/2014/01/07/publicity-leads-to-an-unblock-for-torrentfreak/">Continue reading...</a>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="dropcap dropcap-bg" style="background-color:#333333; font-size:50px;">2</span> days after TorrentFreak posted about Web filtering in the UK Sky has caved and admitted to yet another over blocking mistake and has recategorized <a href="http://torrentfreak.com">torrentfreak.com</a> so it is now reachable.</p>
<p>In the opening of their article the BBC clearly state that overblocking is affecting lots of other legitimate websites;</p>
<blockquote><p>filters are intended to allow parents to ensure children cannot view adult content.</p>
<p>But the automatic blocking of all file-sharing sites meant that news site TorrentFreak and other legitimate sites were also blocked.</p>
<p><small>BBC</small></p>
</blockquote>
<p>Whilst this is a victory for TorrentFreak.com there are still plenty of other site owners that may not know if they have been blocked and are losing revenue or being blocked from providing the help they are trying to provide.</p>
<p>Read the full story here: <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-25638872">http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-25638872</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://survivetheclaireperryinter.net/2014/01/07/publicity-leads-to-an-unblock-for-torrentfreak/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>BBC Newsnight exposes Filter Overblocking</title>
		<link>https://survivetheclaireperryinter.net/2013/12/19/bbc-newsnight-exposes-filter-overblocking/</link>
		<comments>https://survivetheclaireperryinter.net/2013/12/19/bbc-newsnight-exposes-filter-overblocking/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Dec 2013 08:46:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Op]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Censorship Reporting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Overblocking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BBC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Block]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Filter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sky]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TalkTalk]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://survivetheclaireperryinter.net/?p=72</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As the four ISPs who are spearheading the ill-fated UK Internet filters are on the eve of rolling out their solutions the BBCs Newsnight program experimented the filters and unsurprisingly encountered distressing overblocking. Let&#8217;s not forget that back in June Ms Perry dismissed concerns about overblocking as a &#8220;load of cock&#8221; and yet here is the<br /><a class="moretag" href="/2013/12/19/bbc-newsnight-exposes-filter-overblocking/">Continue reading...</a>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As the four ISPs who are spearheading the ill-fated UK Internet filters are on the eve of rolling out their solutions the BBCs Newsnight program experimented the filters and unsurprisingly encountered distressing overblocking.</p>
<blockquote><p>BT blocked sites including <a href="http://www.sexualhealthscotland.co.uk/">Sexual Health Scotland</a>, <a href="http://host22.qnop.net/~doncaste/">Doncaster Domestic Abuse Helpline</a>, and <a href="http://www.reducingtherisk.org.uk/cms/">Reducing The Risk</a>, a site which tackles domestic abuse.<small>BBC</small></p>
</blockquote>
<p>Let&#8217;s not forget that back in June Ms Perry <a href="https://www.openrightsgroup.org/blog/2013/website-filtering-problems-are-a-load-of-cock">dismissed concerns about overblocking as a &#8220;load of cock&#8221;</a> and yet here is the BBC telling the world that at the behest of the UK Government our ISPs are preventing people from accessing help after being raped or having suffered from domestic abuse.</p>
<p>After being confronted by the errors the ISPs had the following to say for themselves;</p>
<blockquote><p>Sadly there is no silver bullet when it comes to internet safety and we have always been clear that no solution can ever be 100%. We continue to develop HomeSafe and welcome feedback to help us continually improve the service.<small>TalkTalk</small></p>
</blockquote>
<blockquote><p>We know that no one single technology currently provides all the answers. That&#8217;s why we have a quick and easy way for misclassified sites to be unblocked. Any Sky home has the ability to fully customise their filters.<small>Sky</small></p>
</blockquote>
<blockquote><p>Categorisations are constantly updated to keep pace with changing content on the internet and we will investigate any concerns and make changes as necessary. BT Parental Controls can be customised to suit each individual family&#8217;s needs.<small>BT</small></p>
</blockquote>
<p>You can read the full article <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-25430582">here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://survivetheclaireperryinter.net/2013/12/19/bbc-newsnight-exposes-filter-overblocking/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Jimmy Wales: David Cameron&#8217;s porn filter idea is ridiculous and will fail</title>
		<link>https://survivetheclaireperryinter.net/2013/08/03/jimmy-wales-david-camerons-porn-filter-idea-is-ridiculous-and-will-fail/</link>
		<comments>https://survivetheclaireperryinter.net/2013/08/03/jimmy-wales-david-camerons-porn-filter-idea-is-ridiculous-and-will-fail/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Aug 2013 00:55:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Op]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Censorship Reporting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BBC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Block]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cameron]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Filter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Overblocking]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://survivetheclaireperryinter.net/?p=78</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wikipedia co-founder Jimmy Wales, one of David Cameron&#8217;s most high-profile technology advisers, has rubbished plans to introduce porn filters through the UK&#8217;s internet service providers, dismissing the proposals as &#8220;ridiculous&#8221; and saying money would be better spent on policing internet crime. He went on further to say The ISPs hate the idea, consumers hate the<br /><a class="moretag" href="/2013/08/03/jimmy-wales-david-camerons-porn-filter-idea-is-ridiculous-and-will-fail/">Continue reading...</a>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wikipedia co-founder Jimmy Wales, one of David Cameron&#8217;s most high-profile technology advisers, has rubbished plans to introduce porn filters through the UK&#8217;s internet service providers, dismissing the proposals as &#8220;ridiculous&#8221; and saying money would be better spent on policing internet crime.</p>
<p>He went on further to say</p>
<blockquote><p>We should be devoting a significant proportion of that to dealing with the real criminal issues online, stealing credit card numbers, hacking into sites … that is going to take an investment in real, solid police work.<small>The Guardian</small></p>
</blockquote>
<p>The ISPs hate the idea, consumers hate the idea and even the Governments own celebrity advisors hate the idea.</p>
<p>But they are going to go ahead, you know, <em>for the children&#8230;</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://survivetheclaireperryinter.net/2013/08/03/jimmy-wales-david-camerons-porn-filter-idea-is-ridiculous-and-will-fail/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
